University of Sussex
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Interpellative sociology of pharmaceuticals: problems and challenges for innovation and regulation in the 21st century

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 05:22 authored by John Abraham, Courtney Davis
This paper develops a framework with which to interrogate how well pharmaceutical innovation and regulation are performing to produce drugs that improve health. That framework comprises five key dimensions: therapeutic advance of drug product innovations; safety standards in drug testing; use of surrogate measures of clinical benefit; independence of regulatory agencies; and public access to regulatory science. It is concluded that: more demanding regulatory intervention is required in order to increase the proportion of drug innovation that actually offers therapeutic benefits over existing products; drug regulatory agencies need much greater independence from the pharmaceutical industry; the erosion of safety standards since 1990 needs to be reversed; accelerated approvals of drugs based on surrogate, rather than clinical endpoints, require much greater critical attention; and much more extensive public access to regulatory science is required in order for regulatory decision-making to be thoroughly accountable to the public and the wider scientific community.

History

Publication status

  • Published

Journal

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

ISSN

0953-7325

Issue

3

Volume

19

Page range

387-402

Pages

20.0

Department affiliated with

  • Sociology and Criminology Publications

Notes

Informed by ESRC-funded international empirical research (ESRC Ref L218252001), this article proposes a new sociological approach to technological innovation and regulation by going beyond descriptive accounts of how stakeholders have `constructed their worlds' to interrogate how those constructions compare with the publicly declared goals and rationales for pharmaceutical innovation and regulation. Authors' contribution was equal in all respects.

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2012-02-06

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC