File(s) not publicly available
Googling for 'opposites': a web-based study of antonym canonicity
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 06:19 authored by Steven Jones, Carita Paradis, M. Lynne MurphyM. Lynne Murphy, Caroline WillnersThis paper seeks to explain why some semantically-opposed word pairs are more likely to be seen as canonical antonyms (for example, cold/hot) than others (icy/scorching, cold/fiery, freezing/hot, etc.). Specifically, it builds on research which has demonstrated that, in discourse, antonyms are inclined to favour certain frames, such as ‘X and Y alike’, ‘from X to Y’ and ‘either X or Y’ (Justeson and Katz, 1991; etc.), and to serve a limited range of discourse functions (Jones, 2002). Our premise is that the more canonical an antonym pair is, the greater the fidelity with which it will occupy such frames. Since an extremely large corpus is needed to identify meaningful patterns of co-occurrence, we turn to Internet data for this research. As well as enabling the notion of antonym canonicity to be revisited from a more empirical perspective, this approach also allows us to evaluate the appropriateness (and assess the risks) of using the World Wide Web as a corpus for studies into certain types of low-frequency textual phenomena.
History
Publication status
- Published
Journal
CorporaISSN
1749-5032External DOI
Issue
2Volume
2Page range
129-155Department affiliated with
- English Publications
Notes
Completed under a British Academy Small Grant. Principal Investigator = ML MurphyFull text available
- No
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2012-02-06Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC