University of Sussex
Browse
s12910-017-0207-8.pdf (459.55 kB)

Healthcare professionals’ and patients’ perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach

Download (459.55 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-09, 08:08 authored by Gabrielle Samuel, Sandi Dheesa, Bobbie FarsidesBobbie Farsides, Angela Fenwick, Anneke Lucassen
Background: This paper proposes a refocusing of consent for clinical genetic testing, moving away from an emphasis on autonomy and information provision, towards an emphasis on the virtues of healthcare professionals seeking consent, and the relationships they construct with their patients. Methods: We draw on focus groups with UK healthcare professionals working in the field of clinical genetics, as well as in-depth interviews with patients who have sought genetic testing in the UK’s National Health Service (data collected 2013–2015). We explore two aspects of consent: first, how healthcare professionals consider the act of ‘consenting’patients; and second how these professional accounts, along with the accounts of patients, deepen our understanding of the consent process. Results: Our findings suggest that while healthcare professionals working in genetic medicine put much effort into ensuring patients’understanding about their impending genetic test, they acknowledge, and we show, that patients can still leave genetic consultations relatively uninformed. Moreover, we show how placing emphasis on the informational aspect of genetic testing is not always reflective of, or valuable to, patients’decision-making. Rather, decision-making is socially contextualises–also based on factors outside of information provision. Conclusions: A more collaborative on-going consent process, grounded in virtue ethics and values of honesty,openness and trustworthiness, is proposed.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

BMC Medical Ethics

ISSN

1472-6939

Publisher

BioMed Central

Issue

47

Volume

18

Department affiliated with

  • Clinical and Experimental Medicine Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2017-09-29

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2017-09-29

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2017-09-29

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC