400.pdf (127.17 kB)
Discussing randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy: evaluation of a Cancer Research UK training programme
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-07, 16:15 authored by Valerie JenkinsValerie Jenkins, Lesley FallowfieldLesley Fallowfield, I Solis-Trapala, C I Langridge, V FarewellObjective. To evaluate a training intervention aimed at improving healthcare professionals' communication with cancer patients about randomised clinical trials. Design. Before and after evaluation of training programme. Setting. Members of the National Cancer Research Network, Scottish Trials Network, and the Welsh Cancer Trials Network Participants. 101 healthcare professionals (33 clinicians and 68 research nurses). Intervention. Four modules delivered by a trained facilitator using videotapes and interactive exercises to cover general issues about discussing randomised clinical trials with patients, problems specific to adjuvant trials, trials with palliation as the goal, and trials where patients had a strong preference for one treatment arm. Main outcome measures Before and after the intervention, participants were videotaped discussing a trial with an actor portraying a patient. These consultations were assessed for presence of information required by good clinical practice guidelines. The actor patients gave an assessment after each interview. Participants reported their self confidence about key aspects of trial discussion. Results. Analysis of the videotaped consultations showed that, after intervention, significantly more participants displayed key communication behaviours such as explaining randomisation (69 v 81, odds ratio 2.33, P = 0.033), checking patients' understanding (11 v 31, odds ratio 3.22, P = 0.002), and discussing standard treatment (73 v 88, odds ratio 4.75, P = 0.005) and side effects (69 v 85, odds ratio 3.29, P = 0.006). Participants' self confidence increased significantly (P < 0.001) across all areas. Actor patients' ratings of participants' communication showed significant improvements for 12/15 key items. Conclusion. This intensive 8 hour intervention significantly improved participants' confidence and competence when communicating about randomised clinical trials.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
BMJISSN
1759-2151Publisher
BMJ Publishing GroupPublisher URL
External DOI
Issue
7488Volume
330Page range
400-403Department affiliated with
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2012-04-30First Open Access (FOA) Date
2016-03-22First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2016-11-10Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC