University of Sussex
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Gender and mode of assessment at university: Should we assume female students are better suited to coursework and males to unseen examinations?

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 09:47 authored by Ruth Woodfield, Sarah Earl-Novell, Lucy Solomon
This paper reports on research conducted at the University of Sussex and examines whether female students have a particular preference for coursework, and whether such a preference is a key factor in their current undergraduate success. The performances of 638 students on courses whose assessment modes comprised both coursework and examinations were analysed to determine what, if any, gender differences were evident in relation to performances on each elements. In order to supplement the quantitative findings, qualitative data elicited via two online surveys, and focusing on student perceptions of coursework and examinations and attitudes to undergraduate study, are also discussed. Our findings contribute to the debate about gender differences across modes of assessment, and in particular take issue with the claim that female students, by contrast with males, both favour and are favoured by the use of coursework as opposed to unseen examinations in mode of assessment arrays.

History

Publication status

  • Published

Journal

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

ISSN

0260-2938

Issue

1

Volume

30

Page range

33-48

Pages

16.0

Department affiliated with

  • Sociology and Criminology Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2012-02-06

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC