Tools
Ramachandran, Murali (2012) The KK-principle, margins for error, and safety. Erkenntnis, 76 (1). pp. 121-136. ISSN 0165-0106
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9311-1
Abstract
This paper considers, and rejects, three strategies aimed at showing that the KK-principle fails even in most favourable circumstances (all emerging from Williamson’s Knowledge and its Limits). The case against the final strategy provides positive grounds for thinking that the principle should hold good in such situations
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Schools and Departments: | School of History, Art History and Philosophy > Philosophy |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Depositing User: | Juan Loera Gonzalez |
Date Deposited: | 16 Apr 2012 14:02 |
Last Modified: | 11 Feb 2013 12:29 |
URI: | http://srodev.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/38629 |