0004-637X_752_1_12.pdf (6.51 MB)
The XMM Cluster Survey: the stellar mass assembly of fossil galaxies
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 12:48 authored by Craig D Harrison, Christopher J Miller, Joseph W Richards, E J Lloyd-Davies, Ben Hoyle, Kathy RomerKathy Romer, Nicola Mehrtens, Matt Hilton, John P Stott, Diego Capozzi, Chris A Collins, Paul-James Deadman, Andrew R Liddle, Martin Sahlén, S Adam Stanford, Pedro T P VianaThis paper presents both the result of a search for fossil systems (FSs) within the XMM Cluster Survey and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the results of a study of the stellar mass assembly and stellar populations of their fossil galaxies. In total, 17 groups and clusters are identified at z < 0.25 with large magnitude gaps between the first and fourth brightest galaxies. All the information necessary to classify these systems as fossils is provided. For both groups and clusters, the total and fractional luminosity of the brightest galaxy is positively correlated with the magnitude gap. The brightest galaxies in FSs (called fossil galaxies) have stellar populations and star formation histories which are similar to normal brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs). However, at fixed group/cluster mass, the stellar masses of the fossil galaxies are larger compared to normal BCGs, a fact that holds true over a wide range of group/cluster masses. Moreover, the fossil galaxies are found to contain a significant fraction of the total optical luminosity of the group/cluster within 0.5 R 200, as much as 85%, compared to the non-fossils, which can have as little as 10%. Our results suggest that FSs formed early and in the highest density regions of the universe and that fossil galaxies represent the end products of galaxy mergers in groups and clusters.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
Astrophysical JournalISSN
0004-637XPublisher
Institute of PhysicsExternal DOI
Issue
1Volume
752Page range
12Department affiliated with
- Physics and Astronomy Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2012-11-09First Open Access (FOA) Date
2016-03-22First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2016-08-17Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC