Spatial Abilities of Expert Clinical Anatomists.pdf (362.63 kB)
Spatial abilities of expert clinical anatomists: comparison of abilities between novices, intermediates, and experts in anatomy
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 16:03 authored by Ruth Fernandez, Itiel E Dror, Claire SmithClaire SmithSpatial ability has been found to be a good predictor of success in learning anatomy. However, little research has explored whether spatial ability can be improved through anatomy education and experience. This study had two aims: (1) to determine if spatial ability is a learned or inherent facet in learning anatomy and (2) to ascertain if there is any difference in spatial ability between experts and novices in anatomy. Fifty participants were identified: 10 controls, 10 novices, 10 intermediates, and 20 experts. Participants completed four computerized spatial ability tasks, a visual mental rotation task, categorical spatial judgment task, metric spatial task, and an image-scanning task. The findings revealed that experts (P = 0.007) and intermediates (P = 0.016) were better in the metric spatial task than novices in terms of making more correct spatial judgments. Experts (P = 0.033), intermediates (P = 0.003), and novices (P = 0.004) were better in the categorical spatial task than controls in terms of speed of responses. These results suggest that certain spatial cognitive abilities are especially important and characteristic of work needed in clinical anatomy, and that education and experience contribute to further development of these abilities.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Accepted version
Journal
Anatomical Sciences EducationISSN
1935-9780Publisher
Wiley-BlackwellExternal DOI
Issue
1Volume
4Page range
1-8Department affiliated with
- BSMS Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2013-10-11First Open Access (FOA) Date
2016-11-15First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2016-11-15Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC