Finlayson, Gordon (2014) Hegel, Adorno and immanent criticism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22 (6). pp. 1142-1166. ISSN 0960-8788
![]()
|
PDF (Hegel, Adorno, Immanent Criticism)
- Accepted Version
Download (301kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Although there is discussion of immanent criticism by philosophers of quite different persuasions, working in separate areas and in different traditions of philosophy, almost all of them agree on the same story about its origins. It is that Hegel invented immanent criticism, that Marx later developed it, and that the various members of the Frankfurt School, particularly Adorno, refined it in various ways, and that they are all paradigmatic practitioners of immanent criticism. There are four different claims in the Continuity Thesis that interest me.
i. Hegel is the originator of immanent criticism.
ii. Hegel’s dialectical method is that of immanent criticism.
iii. Adorno practices immanent criticism and endorses the term as a description of his practice.
iv Adorno’s dialectical method is fundamentally Hegelian.
I argue that i and ii are depending how they are interpreted, either false or platitudinous. iii and iv are defensible, but not as usually supposed.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Schools and Departments: | School of History, Art History and Philosophy > Philosophy |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BD Speculative Philosophy > BD010 General philosophical works B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BD Speculative Philosophy > BD240 Methodology D History General and Old World > DD History of Germany > DD301 Prussia > DD341 History J Political Science > JA Political science (General) > JA0071 Theory. Relation to other subjects |
Depositing User: | Gordon Finlayson |
Date Deposited: | 26 Nov 2014 16:40 |
Last Modified: | 06 Sep 2017 15:53 |
URI: | http://srodev.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/51480 |
View download statistics for this item
📧 Request an update