Booth, Anthony Robert (2006) Can there be epistemic reasons for action? Grazer Philosophische Studien - Internationale Zeitschrift für Analytische Philosophie, 73 (1). pp. 133-144. ISSN 0165-9227
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
In this paper I consider whether there can be such things as epistemic reasons for action. I consider three arguments to the contrary and argue that none are successful, being either somewhat question-begging or too strong by ruling out what most epistemologists think is a necessary feature of epistemic justification, namely the epistemic basing relation. I end by suggesting a "non-cognitivist" model of epistemic reasons that makes room for there being epistemic reasons for action and suggest that this model may support moral realism.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Schools and Departments: | School of History, Art History and Philosophy > Philosophy |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Depositing User: | Anthony Booth |
Date Deposited: | 08 Mar 2015 10:48 |
Last Modified: | 08 Mar 2015 10:48 |
URI: | http://srodev.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/53266 |