Eriksson, Kimmo, Strimling, Pontus and Coultas, Julie C (2015) Bidirectional associations between descriptive and injunctive norms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129. pp. 59-69. ISSN 0749-5978

Preview

PDF Download (471kB) | Preview

Abstract

Modern research on social norms makes an important distinction between descriptive norms (how people commonly behave) and injunctive norms (what one is morally obligated to do). Here we propose that this distinction is far from clear in the cognition of social norms. In a first study, using the implicit association test, the concepts of ‘‘common’’ and ‘‘moral’’ were found to be strongly associated. Some implications of this automatic common–moral association were investigated in a subsequent series of experiments: Our participants tended to make explicit inferences from descriptive norms to injunctive norms and vice versa; they tended to mix up descriptive and injunctive concepts in recall tasks; and frequency information influenced participants’ own moral judgments. We conclude by discussing how the common–moral association could play a role in the dynamics of social norms.

Item Type:	Article
Keywords:	Descriptive norms, injunctive norms, automatic association, priming, implicit association test, recall, moral judgements, frequency dependence, conformity, social influence
Schools and Departments:	School of Psychology > Psychology
Subjects:	Q Science > QZ Psychology
Depositing User:	Julie Coultas
Date Deposited:	30 Jun 2015 09:01
Last Modified:	06 Mar 2017 18:11
URI:	http://srodev.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/55039

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update