University of Sussex
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Are task irrelevant faces unintentionally processed? Implicit learning as a test case.

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 21:32 authored by Baruch Eitam, Ruth Glass-Hackel, Hillel Aviezer, Zoltan DienesZoltan Dienes, Roy Shoval, E Tory Higgins
Faces are one of the most important signals for reading people’s mental states. In sync with their apparent “chronic” (cross-situational) relevance, faces have been argued to be processed independently of the task one is currently performing. Many of these demonstrations have involved “capture of attention” or increased interference by faces functioning as distractors. Here we ask whether multiple repetitions of task irrelevant faces leave a trace in the system. Specifically, we tested whether repeating structures instantiated by task irrelevant faces are unintentionally or implicitly learned. Our findings indicate that although faces are indeed unique in that they are the only stimulus found to lead to implicit learning of complex rules when irrelevant, such learning is small in magnitude. Although these results support the conjecture that task irrelevant faces are processed, the functional significance of this learning needs to be assessed.

History

Publication status

  • Published

Journal

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

ISSN

0096-1523

Publisher

American Psychological Association

Issue

5

Volume

40

Page range

1741-1747

Department affiliated with

  • Psychology Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2015-07-10

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC