University of Sussex
Browse
1/1
2 files

Framing ‘fracking’: exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 22:25 authored by Laurence WilliamsLaurence Williams, Phil Macnaghten, Richard Davies, Sarah Curtis
The prospect of fracking in the United Kingdom has been accompanied by significant public unease. We outline how the policy debate is being framed by UK institutional actors, finding evidence of a dominant discourse in which the policy approach is defined through a deficit model of public understanding of science and in which a technical approach to feasibility and safety is deemed as sufficient grounds for good policymaking. Deploying a deliberative focus group methodology with lay publics across different sites in the north of England, we find that these institutional framings are poorly aligned with participants’ responses. We find that unease regularly overflows the focus on safety and feasibility and cannot be satisfactorily explained by a lack of understanding on the part of participants. We find that scholarship from science and technology studies productively elucidates our participants’ largely sceptical positions, and orientates strategies for responding to them more effectively.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

Public Understanding of Science

ISSN

0963-6625

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Issue

1

Volume

26

Page range

89-104

Department affiliated with

  • SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit Publications

Notes

Acknowledgement: The final version of this paper has been published in Public Understanding of Science, Sage Choice doi: 10.1177/0963662515595159, July/2015 by SAGE Publications Ltd, All rights reserved. © Williams et al., year of publication. It is available at: http://pus.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/07/13/0963662515595159.short?rss=1&ssource=mfr This research was carried out as part of the ReFINE(Researching Fracking in Europe) consortium which is led by Durham and Newcastle Universities and which was funded at the time by the Natural Environment Research Council (UK), Shell and Chevron. It also received funding from the Durham Energy Institute’s Small Grant Scheme. We are grateful to the Durham University Faculty of Science Ethics Committee and the UK Research Integrity Office for their time in providing advice on research ethics. We thank the ReFINE Independent Science Board (http://www.refine.org.uk/how-we-work/independent-science-board) for spending time prioritising the research projects undertaken by ReFINE.

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2015-09-07

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2015-09-07

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2015-09-07

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC