Sawyer, Sarah (2015) Contrastive self-knowledge and the McKinsey paradox. In: Goldberg, Sanford C (ed.) Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and Skepticism New Essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 75-93. ISBN 9781107063501
This is the latest version of this item.
![]() |
PDF
- Draft Version
Restricted to SRO admin only Download (336kB) |
Abstract
In this paper I argue first, that a contrastive account of self-knowledge and the propositional attitudes entails an anti-individualist account of propositional attitude concepts (the concepts of belief, desire, regret, and so on), second, that the final account provides a solution to the McKinsey paradox, and third, that the account has the resources to explain why certain anti-skeptical arguments fail.
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Schools and Departments: | School of History, Art History and Philosophy > Philosophy |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Related URLs: | |
Depositing User: | Sarah Sawyer |
Date Deposited: | 19 Oct 2015 14:02 |
Last Modified: | 19 Oct 2015 14:07 |
URI: | http://srodev.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/57185 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Contrastive self-knowledge and the McKinsey paradox. (deposited 29 Oct 2014 12:32)
- Contrastive self-knowledge and the McKinsey paradox. (deposited 19 Oct 2015 14:02) [Currently Displayed]
View download statistics for this item
📧 Request an update