ERSS-D-16-00025R1.pdf (685.36 kB)
Debating climate economics: a response to Ackerman's critique of climate damage modeling
Ackerman and Munitz (2016) offer a critique of estimates of the economic impact of climate change and the social cost of carbon in general, and the FUND model in particular. I am grateful for the opportunity to reply. In this response, I note that (i) their concerns are not new; (ii) they highlight strengths of FUND rather than its weaknesses; and (iii) they revisit their old mistakes. I conclude with a few improvements to FUND prompted by Messrs Ackerman and Munitz.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Accepted version
Journal
Energy Research & Social ScienceISSN
2214-6296Publisher
ElsevierExternal DOI
Volume
17Page range
165-166Department affiliated with
- Economics Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2016-04-08First Open Access (FOA) Date
2017-05-07First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2016-04-08Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC