University of Sussex
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

The determinants of subjective wellbeing: An analysis of health and wellbeing survey in Southeast England

conference contribution
posted on 2023-06-09, 07:34 authored by A M Lagnado, K Gilchrist, Anjum MemonAnjum Memon
Background The concept of wellbeing is now increasingly used as one of the key measures of societal progress, along with the traditional methods that are based on economic activity. Subjective wellbeing (SW) is a construct by which national wellbeing can be measured—this can inform development of health and social policy. The objective of this study was to determine the association between sociodemographic/personal factors and low subjective wellbeing. Methods Data from the health and wellbeing survey conducted in Brighton and Hove in 2012 (n=2035) were analysed. The survey included the Office of National Statistics (ONS) verified measure of SW, which consisted of four questions regarding life satisfaction, fulfilment, happiness and anxiety. Low SW was the outcome measure, the threshold of which was determined according to the Faculty of Public Health outcome framework. The survey also included a range of population measures, sixteen of which were chosen as explanatory variables. The analysis included descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression, using the SPSS statistical programme. Results are presented as adjusted odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results In the multivariate analysis, poor general health (self-reported) was strongly associated with low SW: dissatisfaction with life (OR=3.9, 95% CI, 2.7-5.6), unfulfilled (3.4, 2.3-4.8), unhappiness (3.0, 2.1-4.2), anxiety (2.4, 1.7-3.3). Other factors significantly associated with low SW included: illness and disability, low social capital, lack of physical exercise, a history of self-harm, not owning a home, not being in a relationship and being middle aged. On the other hand, unemployment, deprivation and poor education were not associated with SW. Conclusion This study demonstrates that an individual’s SW is likely to be affected by a number of sociodemographic/personal factors. The limitations of this study include the extent of external validity, the lack of causality and potential selection and information bias. These findings are relevant to the design and delivery of policy aimed at improving the perception of wellbeing in individuals and the general population.

History

Publication status

  • Published

Journal

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

ISSN

0143-005X

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

Issue

Suppl

Volume

71

Article number

A86

Event name

Society for Social Medicine, Annual Scientific Meeting 2017

Event location

Manchester

Event type

conference

Event date

6-8 September 2017

Department affiliated with

  • Primary Care and Public Health Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2019-02-21

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC