University of Sussex
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Which bisphosphonates do oncologists prescribe for women with metastatic breast cancer and why? Results of a UK survey

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-07, 16:02 authored by Lesley FallowfieldLesley Fallowfield, Valerie JenkinsValerie Jenkins, Robert Coleman
In breast cancer, many bisphosphonates are approved for use in metastatic bone disease which significantly delay and reduce the risk and rate of skeletal complications. There is a paucity of evidence about the relative efficacy of different drugs, routes of administration or optimal doses. Oral and IV administration have various advantages and disadvantages. A total of 112/144 (78%) UK oncologists completed a postal survey about their bisphosphonate prescribing practices and reasons for them. Fifty three percent gave both oral and IV drugs, 40% only IV and 7% only oral. In the absence of scientific evidence, financial constraints often dictated choice and route of administration or local guidelines which were extremely varied. The primary advantages perceived for oral drugs were patient convenience (48%) and for IV to ensure compliance or bioavailability (37%). Adherence to oral bisphosphonates is often poor, but 44% oncologists expected good adherence in >71% patients. More clinical trial data are needed to inform practice.

History

Publication status

  • Published

Journal

Breast

ISSN

0960-9776

Publisher

Elsevier

Issue

5

Volume

17

Page range

459-463

Department affiliated with

  • Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2011-08-26

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC