Field, Andy P (2003) Can meta-analysis be trusted? Psychologist, 16 (12). pp. 642-645. ISSN 0952-8229

Preview

PDF Download (114kB) | Preview

Abstract

Until around 25 years ago the only way to assimilate and evaluate research evidence was through discursive literature reviews, in which someone with an interest in a given research topic would accumulate and subjectively evaluate the importance of research findings in that area. These reviews, although informative, are highly reliant on the discretion of the author who, with the best will in the world, could be unaware of important findings or could give particular importance to studies that others might believe to be relatively less important (see Wolf, 1986).
The failure of literature reviews to provide objective ways to assimilate scientific evidence led scientists to look a statistical solution. The groundbreaking work of Glass (1976) and Rosenthal and Rubin (1978) paved the way for what we now know as meta-analysis: a statistical technique by which findings from independent studies can be assimilated.

Item Type:	Article
Schools and Departments:	School of Psychology > Psychology
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HA Statistics B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Related URLs:	http://www.bps.org.uk/publications/theps...
Depositing User:	Andy Field
Date Deposited:	18 Jan 2007
Last Modified:	07 Mar 2017 01:33
URI:	http://srodev.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/714
Google Scholar:	21 Citations

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update