Liberal Paradoxes.pdf (501.93 kB)
Liberal paradoxes: women’s body, religious expression, and gender equality in a secular age
The debate over the hijab has become an arena of fervent discussion in Europe. The recent political developments have opened a discussion on the relationship between a “secularized” West and an Islamic world. At the heart of this debate is the juridical regulation of women’s body and whether a simple piece of cloth such as the veil should be allowed or prohibited. This article takes into consideration two leading cases decided at the European Court of Human Rights over the practice of veiling which rely on the assumption that the headscarf is incompatible with western democratic values because irreconcilable with the principle of gender equality. I argue that the hijab cannot be seen as an expression of women’s oppression, as the concept of freedom and agency changes in different historical and cultural contexts: thus, what these decisions reveal is that the universalism of the Western/liberal concept of freedom and agency has been the main domain through which to read women’s oppression and their possibility of agency.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
AG AboutGenderISSN
2279-5057Publisher
University of GenoaIssue
10Volume
5Page range
166-185Department affiliated with
- Law Publications
Research groups affiliated with
- Sussex Centre for Human Rights Research Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2017-11-20First Open Access (FOA) Date
2017-11-20First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2017-11-20Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC