Dijk2018_Article_MeasurementPropertiesOfDepress.pdf (1.03 MB)
Measurement properties of depression questionnaires in patients with diabetes: a systematic review
Version 2 2023-06-12, 08:49
Version 1 2023-06-09, 11:56
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 08:49 authored by Susan E M van Dijk, Marcel C Adriaanse, Lennart van der Zwaan, Judith E Bosmans, Harm van MarwijkHarm van Marwijk, Maurits W van Tulder, Caroline B TerweePurpose: To conduct a systematic review on measurement properties of questionnaires measuring depressive symptoms in adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Methods: A systematic review of the literature in MEDLINE, EMbase and PsycINFO was performed. Full text, original articles, published in any language up to October 2016 were included. Eligibility for inclusion was independently assessed by three reviewers who worked in pairs. Methodological quality of the studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Quality of the questionnaires was rated per measurement property, based on the number and quality of the included studies and the reported results. Results: Of 6286 unique hits, 21 studies met our criteria evaluating nine different questionnaires in multiple settings and languages. The methodological quality of the included studies was variable for the different measurement properties: 9/15 studies scored ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ on internal consistency, 2/5 on reliability, 0/1 on content validity, 10/10 on structural validity, 8/11 on hypothesis testing, 1/5 on cross-cultural validity, and 4/9 on criterion validity. For the CES-D, there was strong evidence for good internal consistency, structural validity, and construct validity; moderate evidence for good criterion validity; and limited evidence for good cross-cultural validity. The PHQ-9 and WHO-5 also performed well on several measurement properties. However, the evidence for structural validity of the PHQ-9 was inconclusive. The WHO-5 was less extensively researched and originally not developed to measure depression. Conclusion: Currently, the CES-D is best supported for measuring depressive symptoms in diabetes patients.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
Quality of Life ResearchISSN
0962-9343Publisher
SpringerExternal DOI
Issue
6Volume
27Page range
1415-1430Department affiliated with
- Primary Care and Public Health Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2018-02-06First Open Access (FOA) Date
2019-02-02First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2018-02-06Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC