University of Sussex
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

The quality of research evidence in social policy: consensus and dissension among researchers

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-09, 12:50 authored by Joe Sempik, Saul Becker, Alan Bryman
Social policy researchers' perceptions of the quality of published work were explored through an online questionnaire, discussion groups and telephone interviews. While there was general agreement on some criteria of quality, there was dissension on others. For example, there were different interpretations of the concepts of 'originality', 'significance' and 'rigour' and differing perceptions of their importance. Criteria of quality deemed to be 'very important' included accessibility of published work and appropriate and transparent research methods. Those perceived as less important included publication of work in refereed academic journals. The concept of quality was not found to be uniform but contested, with respondents having a range of views.

History

Publication status

  • Published

Journal

Evidence & Policy

ISSN

1744-2648

Publisher

Policy Press

Issue

3

Volume

3

Page range

407-423

Department affiliated with

  • Social Work and Social Care Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2018-04-11

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC