No proviso: Habermas on Rawls, religion and public reason

Finlayson, James Gordon (2018) No proviso: Habermas on Rawls, religion and public reason. European Journal of Political Theory. pp. 1-22. ISSN 1474-8851

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Download (163kB)
[img] PDF - Published Version
Restricted to SRO admin only

Download (179kB)


In this article, I argue that a common view of Habermas’s theory of public reason, which takes it to be similar to Rawls’s ‘proviso’, is mistaken. I explain why that mistake arises, and show that those who have made it have thus overlooked the distinctiveness of Habermas’s theory and approach. Consequently, I argue, they tend to wrongly infer that objections directed at Rawls’s ‘proviso’ apply also to Habermas’s ‘institutional translation proviso’. Ironically, Habermas’s attempt to rebut those objections leads him to advance a peculiar, and ultimately indefensible, thesis about the cognitive requirements of democratic citizenship for secular citizens. I argue that the underlying problem that Habermas takes the peculiar thesis to solve is not that the public reason requirements of the secular state are unfair towards religious citizens, or biased towards secular views of the world, but that the nature of religious arguments, and of scientism, as Habermas understands these, prevents citizens who adhere to them from participating in discourse. I end by suggesting a simpler, less controversial solution to that problem.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Habermas Rawls Religion Public Reason, Proviso
Schools and Departments: School of History, Art History and Philosophy > Philosophy
Research Centres and Groups: Centre for Social and Political Thought
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) > B3258.H32 Habermas, Jürgen
H Social Sciences
J Political Science
K Law
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Gordon Finlayson
Date Deposited: 17 Oct 2018 10:03
Last Modified: 02 Nov 2018 09:46

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update